Title: Has re-design replaced revolution? Date: 2008-09-17 11:26 Author: Femke Tags: Texts, Design philosopy, Reading list, Tools Slug: has-design-replaced-revolution Status: published ![latour network]({filename}/images/uploads/ant.gif "ant"){: .float }Philosopher of science, [Bruno Latour](http://www.bruno-latour.fr), opened the recent [Networks of Design conference](http://www.networksofdesign.co.uk) with a keynote address: *A Cautious Prometheus? A Few Steps Toward a Philosophy of Design*. In his lecture, Latour linked the growing importance of design with his idea that "*matters of fact*" have become "*matters of concern*". Provocatively presenting [Peter Sloterdijk](http://www.petersloterdijk.net/) as philosopher of design, he states: > The great importance of Sloterdijk’s philosophy (and I think the major > interest of a designer’s way of looking at things) is that it offers > another idiom. The idiom of matters of concern reclaims matter, > matters and materiality and renders them into something that can and > must be carefully redesigned. In his conclusion, Latour challenges designers "*to draw things together*", shifting the meaning of design from *re-looking* to a practice which gathers scientist, technicians etc. around the table: > What is needed instead are tools that capture what have always been > the hidden practices of modernist innovations: objects have always > been projects; matters of fact have always been matters of concern. > The tools we need to grasp these hidden practices will teach us just > as much as the old aesthetics of matters of fact —and then again much > more. Download the paper here: